One of the remarkable omissions from much current economic debate in Australia is the role of technological innovation.

The Abbott Government and business focus on industrial relations, tax, debt, deficits and just about everything other than innovation when they talk about economic growth. When they do talk about research it is more likely to be how to cut funding to not only pure research but also applied research as well. read more

One of the marks of the maturity and health of any area of historical inquiry is the extent to which it is subject to ongoing bouts of revisionism.

British social, political and economic history probably reached this stage when the eruptions about the rise (or fall or stagnation) of the late 16^th century and early 17^th century gentry attracted a bevy of high profile historians including Tawney, Stone and Trevor-Roper. While it is now fashionable to see the controversy as more representative of the eminence of the protagonists than the issue itself, it was about big issues like the emergence of the middle classes, whether economic factors underlay the British Civil Wars, the role of the aristocracy and precursor indicators of 18^th century social change. Revisionism over the British Civil Wars is now almost continuous and the blog expects that one day someone will claim that Charles 1 died of a shaving accident. read more

The US Republicans have a few enduring dreams and one of them is that Hispanics are naturally conservative, because they are predominantly Catholic, and will eventually flock to the Republican cause.

Like many things the Republicans believe there is a lot of faith and very little evidence involved. And like many conservative parties, including in Australia, they are perhaps not looking at the real problem. For instance, at the recent Victorian Liberal Party State Conference party elder, David Kemp, presented a report suggesting that there were communication problems with the outgoing Napthine Government and regretting what looked like a good idea at the time when the Baillieu Government hacked into the very professional public service corporate affairs ranks. Yet while discussing communications problems the Conference also managed to pass resolutions calling for an investigation into ‘electoral fraud’ by Labor for using firefighters, parademics and other unionists in ‘fake uniforms’ in their campaign;  the abolition of the ABC and SBS, repeal of 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act; and ‘reform’ of the Human Rights Commission. read more

Fifty years ago, when the blog was an undergraduate devoting more attention to social action than to study, it was lucky enough to be introduced by Colin Benjamin to the work of the person who was probably the most influential modern social activist thinker and practitioner – Saul Alinsky.

The blog has been thinking a lot about Alinsky and Colin Benjamin in recent days while trying to organise speakers for the October PRIA conference on the current trends in grass roots organisation and engaging in discussions with some of the leading practitioners in the field. The thinking was reinforced by a recent detailed reading of Tony Jaques’ new book Issue and Crisis Management which the blog has mentioned a few times in the past year. read more

One of the best ways to define a consultancy is to see who they won’t work for rather than who they do.

Now that may seem odd in the light of the emphasis PR industry critics place on who the clients of particular consultancies are. But the ethics of working for various clients is sometimes problematic and the judgement is often coloured by the views of the critics more than the inherent issues to do with the client. For instance the blog long worked for the forest products industry and to many environmentalists that was an evil decision. read more

What do Barack Obama and Clive Palmer have in common? Not much you might think but in fact both are – away from their day jobs – published poets. Obama in a 1981 issue of the Occidental College literary magazine and Clive with a 23 poem volume Hopes, Dreams  and Reflections. The latter, of course, a poetry manuscript which preceded the party manifesto. read more

At the Adelaide Writers’ Week last week something happened which should terrify those people who are apologists for Israel whatever the Israeli government does or says.

The Writers’ Week had arranged a session, My Palestine, with two speakers. The first was an elegant and intelligent (she casually used an analogy from quantum physics to make a point) woman, Leila Yusaf Chung, whose family were Palestinian refugees who went to Lebanon where she was born. The second was Antony Lowenstein who appears to be a young version of an old-fashioned leftie but who replaces the windy rhetoric of the old and now old new left with a compelling speaking style focussed on facts and is a bit of a bete noir to some in the Australian Jewish community (see his book My Israel Question which is now in its third edition). read more

Reform is one of those Alice in Wonderland words which mean what the speaker wants them to mean. They are often shorthand for why something or other you believe ought to be done as soon as possible – irrespective of the evidence one way or the other.

Reform has a moderately recent history – a bit like the word progress which once just meant moving forward rather than carrying a more progressive subtext.  In the late 18^th and 19^th centuries it meant political and social reform around voting rights, anti-slavery and a host of other Whiggish and Chartist demands. By the middle of the 19^th century it had been supplanted in some circles by the word revolution, although a quick modern day reading of Marx’s Communist Manifesto demands would probably not frighten many modern liberals even if Maurice Newman, or that former Maoist Keith Windschuttle, might have a problem with some of them. read more

A while ago the blog wrote about the manufacture of ignorance. A corollary is the manufacture of outrage.

Tony Jaques in his latest newsletter on issues management recently highlighted the problem of synthetic outrage. See

http://us1.campaign-archive2.com/?u=12234fd351f8df7c1f43248ea&id=48d81fe82f

“Social media has proved a powerful tool for raising legitimate issues onto the public agenda. But it has also facilitated a flood of confected issues and manufactured outrage,” he said. “Identifying the difference between the two is now an emerging challenge for issue managers and other senior executives. When can you reasonably ignore a confected issue and when might a real issue slip under the radar and cause reputational damage?” read more

Newspaper circulation and readership figures are depressing for those brought up in an era when print was important. Not that it’s now  totally unimportant, just that it is neither the dominant influence nor the first port of call for PR people seeking to communicate with audiences.

But the latest Roy Morgan readership figures comparing 2013 and 2014 readership are interesting and, in some respects, surprising. The blog realises the newspaper industry publishes its own figures but the Morgan ones are still pertinent and don’t get much attention in the mainstream media. In terms of readership totals the only newspapers where Monday to Friday readership were up were the Illawarra Mercury, Townsville Bulletin and the Northern Territory News while the Daily Telegraph lost more than 100,000 readers – presumably in the last case a 100,000 people no longer felt the need to consult a tabloid version of a Liberal Party internal magazine. In the case of the Illawarra Mercury and the Terror the increases were around 3,000 and 2,000 respectively. It might not seem like much, but represented increases of 6.6% and 5.4% at a time when everybody else was going backward. read more